4 ms·

It's illegal in California.

• dmitrygr 9mo ago
  > It's illegal in California. 1. What specifically is? Posting twitter comments? Prompting an ML model? Generating images based on existing images? 2. Even if so, states are not allowed to make unconstitutional laws. 1stA covers this, as far as I can tell. Do you read Roth or Miller differently?
  • labrador 9mo ago
    "is posting nudes of women without their consent legal in california" https://www.google.com/search?q=is+posting+nudes+of+women+without+their+consent+legal+in+california https://www.google.com/search?q=is+posting+nudes+of+women+wi...
    • xigoi 9mo ago
      Posting such images is illegal, i.e. it’s the user who has violated the law.
      • Timon3 9mo ago
        But the user isn't posting the image, Grok is. The user can't even delete the image if Grok generated something the user doesn't want.
        • xigoi 9mo ago
          Ah, that’s a terrible implementation then.
  • kccoder 9mo ago
    It’s seems as though you’re being deliberately obtuse. It’s obvious why this is illegal.
• kemayo 9mo ago
  Not just California. Non-consensual deepfake porn is explicitly federally illegal now. Ted Cruz's "Take It Down" Act passed last year: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/146 https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/146 (This may or may not be constitutional in the end, but it's certainly current law on the books.)