> But unsafe Rust, which is generally more often used in low-level code, is more difficult than C and C++. I think "is" is a bit too strong. "Can be", sure, bu

> But unsafe Rust, which is generally more often used in low-level code, is more difficult than C and C++. I think "is" is a bit too strong. "Can be", sure, but I'm rather skeptical that all uses of unsafe Rust will be more difficult than writing equivalent C/C++ code.