3 ms·
... it took a couple searches to figure out that "extreme codesign" wasn't actually code-signing, but "co-design" like "stuff that was designed to work together
by Groxx 10mo ago
... it took a couple searches to figure out that "extreme codesign" wasn't actually code-signing, but "co-design" like "stuff that was designed to work together"
- alfalfasprout 10mo agosame I was so confused
- pyuser583 10mo agoMe too. Good style says to avoid creating words with dashes - it’s Un-American. But clarity matters more than rules.
- gilrain 10mo agoIs there any American style guide that insists hyphens be avoided even when a closed compound would cause ambiguity? I follow Chicago, but I imagine other style guides also already emphasise clarity.
- mortehu 10mo agoWouldn't "code sign" be two words in English? And "code signing" rather than "code sign"?
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- Groxx 10mo agoMostly yes, and I prefer it that way, but it does get smashed into a single word sometimes. "co-design" I've mostly only seen hyphenated, though I don't see it often enough or in broad enough contexts to really claim anything about the frequency in a general sense. Maybe it's caused by `codesign` tools? Like `codesign --extreme` which probably requires two signers to sign one thing?
- utopiah 10mo agoEven << "co-design" like "stuff that was designed to work together" >> sound strange to me. Typically when I read about co-design is stuff that was designed together, by more than 1 party.