3 ms·
I think it should be on the article to prove its title. I hardly think presenting one test case to some different models substantiates the claim that "AI Coding
by ronbenton 9mo ago
I think it should be on the article to prove its title. I hardly think presenting one test case to some different models substantiates the claim that "AI Coding Assistants Are Getting Worse." Note that I have no idea if the title is true or not, but it certainly doesn't follow from the content of the article alone.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- samrus 9mo agoWith llms being hard to test objectively, any claim made about them has to be substantiated with atleast anecdotes. The article presented some backing, if you dont think its enough you gotta present some of your own, or people cant talk you seriously
- ronbenton 9mo agoI did present my own evidence to support _my_ argument that the article is woefully lacking data to support its conclusion. It's not on me to try to make the counterargument (that AI coding assistants aren't getting worse) because that's not my opinion.