4 ms·
Postel's Law strikes again. What's the point of having RFCs with MUST and SHOULD if everyone does what they need? You end up with French cafe[0] implementations
by kjellsbells 9mo ago
Postel's Law strikes again. What's the point of having RFCs with MUST and SHOULD if everyone does what they need? You end up with French cafe[0] implementations.
[0] https://www.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/french_cafe.txt https://www.samba.org/ftp/tridge/misc/french_cafe.txt
- philipwhiuk 9mo agoYou're only required to do a MUST if you claim to implement the RFC at all. You're not required to implement an RFC. The author's mention of a lawsuit for not following an RFC is insane.