3 ms·

I don't feel like the solution to this is having victims set up LLCs.

• b112 9mo ago
  You're advocating taking away, a method people have to protect themselves, with a simple "oh, I'm not so sure". How about you make an iron clad promise people will be safe? How about if someone dies because of your minor concerns, you go to jail for life? Would you be so "oh well" then? If not, you're probably not taking people's very lives seriously.
  • Forgeties79 9mo ago
    I mean I get where they are coming from. It doesn’t strike you as a little odd that people have to protect themselves from dangerous individuals stalking them by setting up businesses? That’s not a little circuitous/indirect? Is that really in line with the purpose of setting up a business in the first place? It’s not like that’s the only way to hide your identity, it’s just one currently available. Plus it’s a very trivial to look up who owns an LLC at least in my state. Not the best solution IMO Either way I think you’re being a little uncharitable towards them. I don’t think they’re trivializing it, I think they’re asking a very legitimate question.
  • Y_Y 9mo ago
    Do you find this style of argument to be productive?
• JoshTriplett 9mo ago
  It isn't, but that's the best solution that is currently available to people. A better solution would be to stop putting people's addresses in public records, and eliminating data brokers that expose name/address correlations.