5 ms·
Three. He fired three people. Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he shou
by Griffinsauce 9mo ago
Three. He fired three people.
Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale.
- lionkor 9mo agoHe himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that.
- 306bobby 9mo ago[flagged]
- lionkor 9mo agoWhat? He could have said 3 if he wanted, but he wanted it to sound worse so he said 75. I know its inferrable how many people it is, but if the guy laying them off doesn't care to say the number, why should someone else when posting this?
- javier123454321 9mo agoBoth of those numbers in isolation dont tell the whole story. Saying firing 3 people sounds like a wednesday at a big company. Saying firing 75% of the staff indicates the impact that those changes will have on everything about the company. The latter is more useful.