3 ms·
> If not, why? Because it was only one of points ("goal posts") that had to be addressed during the conversation on diets. I addressed the point of artificial
by thesz 10mo ago
> If not, why?
Because it was only one of points ("goal posts") that had to be addressed during the conversation on diets.
I addressed the point of artificial sweeteners, I then had to address other points.
You see it as "moving goal posts," I see it as a continuation of conversation.