2 ms·
> To me it is not the question of whether they are right, but whether she had a good reason to be there. To me that's irrelevant - FWiW I come from a largish e
by defrost 10mo ago
> To me it is not the question of whether they are right, but whether she had a good reason to be there.
To me that's irrelevant - FWiW I come from a largish extended family with more than a century of history in various military and civil conflicts.
Well trained personnel should handle the situation of a vehicle blocking traffic in a civilian non theatre of war context in a manner that doesn't lead to escalation.
> If she was following them around and ended up in that situation as a result, I might be more inclined to give ICE a pass. If she is an actual random individual that simply did not know what to do and panicked, then it is an actual problem.
Either way, regardless of her background, three agents gave conflicting instructions, acted in a bullying manner, escalated a situation and shot a citizen.
If she was there in protest, in a country that boasts free speech and the right to protest, that doesn't justify or give a pass to the clown show on camera.
- iugtmkbdfil834 10mo ago<< Either way, regardless of her background, three agents gave conflicting instructions, acted in a bullying manner, escalated a situation and shot a citizen. This should be the rallying cry. But it isn't. As I noted in previous posts, I am not super happy about it, but at this point, the case is alreadya political football.