3 ms·
You're thinking of Radix primitives which Shadcn is built on, but both are component libraries.
by rhymnz 9mo ago
You're thinking of Radix primitives which Shadcn is built on, but both are component libraries.
- lone-cloud 9mo agoMaybe we're arguing semantics, but I think calling shadcn a "basis for a design system" is more accurate than a traditional component library. The difference to me is that shadcn lives inside your codebase and you can fully customize it as you please. You cannot customize a component library like MUI nearly to that extent.