4 ms·
True and what you can realize/read between the lines is something deeper. LLMs are fallible. Humans are fallible. LLMs improve (and improve fast). Humans do no
by mirekrusin 10mo ago
True and what you can realize/read between the lines is something deeper.
LLMs are fallible.
Humans are fallible.
LLMs improve (and improve fast).
Humans do not (overall, ie. "group of N experts in X", "N random internet people").
All those "turing tests" will start flipping.
Today it's "N random internet humans" score too low on those benchmarks, tomorrow it'll be "group of N expert humans in X" score too low.