4 ms·
Kidnapping the president of a country is very clear intent to exert control over a country. The second "de facto" part is about the preconditions of the bet, t
by monocasa 10mo ago
Kidnapping the president of a country is very clear intent to exert control over a country.
The second "de facto" part is about the preconditions of the bet, to define what is Venezuela versus the US.
- prmoustache 10mo ago> Kidnapping the president of a country is very clear intent to exert control over a country. I personnally view it more as a marketing stunt.
- monocasa 10mo agoMaybe in the same way Hiroshima was.