3 ms·
> critical subsets of uses I don't consider rich people trying to hide their identity to be "critical" at all. Maybe having their address public will be a way
by OGEnthusiast 9mo ago
> critical subsets of uses
I don't consider rich people trying to hide their identity to be "critical" at all. Maybe having their address public will be a way to force them to act with consideration of the community instead of just themselves for once while they hide in some anonymous mansion.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- JoshTriplett 9mo ago> rich people What part of "people at risk of doxing" made you jump to "rich people" rather than, for instance, "people in groups commonly attacked"? > force them to act with consideration of the community By doing what, precisely? "Have you tried not being (commonly attacked group here)?"
- sdenton4 9mo agoOnly rich people can afford houses in the US, ergo.
- Forgeties79 9mo ago~65% of the US is rich?
- wyre 9mo agoKeyword was "afford" not own. The average person can not afford to purchase a home (without having to uproot their entire life).
- Forgeties79 9mo agoSome numbers and definitions would go a long way here
- fourseventy 9mo ago[flagged]
- yrxuthst 9mo agoRich people aren't the only ones that want to hide their address. Stalking/DV victims can use this too, or even just a regular person that prefers privacy.
- psunavy03 9mo agoSo basically you're subtly encouraging violence and intimidation, and want that to be easier than trying to find someone's "anonymous mansion."