3 ms·

"Mega-workflow" is a bit vague. Is that a certain size/complexity of process? Sounds interesting but it needs to be able to scale.

• iamsamwood 9mo ago
  Fair point on the terminology. We generally define a "mega-workflow" by the scale of the logic and participants involved—-typically processes spanning multiple teams, 10+ systems, and anywhere from 50 to thousands of individual tasks. We've seen this successfully scale to the largest enterprises (including Allianz & Citi). From what we've seen in enterprise environments, there is a clear progression where these types of processes start to fail: * Stage 1: Simple RPA for basic task repetition. * Stage 2: Low-code/no-code platforms for departmental workflows. * Stage 3: The Breaking Point: When the complexity hits a level where your engineers spend more time maintaining integrations to external systems, fixing broken glue code, and manually stitching together workflow systems, than actually shipping features. This is exactly where Luther Enterprise shines. We’ve also found this approach works equally well for early-stage teams, especially in regulated environments such as in insurance and banking. These founders need a backend fast, but they hit "mega-workflow" complexity on day one because of high participant counts, strict compliance rules, and a massive volume of validation logic for edge cases. You can check out our case studies here https://enterprise.luthersystems.com/product/case-studies https://enterprise.luthersystems.com/product/case-studies where we deep-dive into the specifics.