2 ms·

I thought the same, and yet on the other hand, how could they have done it differently? People don't want to pay a subscription just to write a DSL of CSS. Perh

I thought the same, and yet on the other hand, how could they have done it differently? People don't want to pay a subscription just to write a DSL of CSS. Perhaps they could've done it per project like some companies, but I don't think it'd be as popular as their lifetime model. Ironic.

re-thc 10mo ago
MUI sells paid components paid monthly. Definitely doable for the paid product.
- c-hendricks 10mo ago
  I'm not super familiar with tailwind plus, but I am familiar with MUI. MUIs paid offerings are open-core, you pay for support and a couple of extra features. Tailwind plus looks like paying for basic components (checkboxes, sidebars, buttons) and it doesn't even offer anything like DataGrid (free with mui).
  - re-thc 10mo ago
    > and it doesn't even offer anything like Shows Tailwind was just too little too late.
kelnos 10mo ago
We can go back to how software was sold decades ago: you pay for version 1.0, and get bugfixes for the 1.x series. Then 2.0 is released, and if you want it, you pay again for the 2.x series. And so on. I agree on not wanting a subscription for something like this. But I also acknowledge that if people are still doing work on something post-sale (beyond bugfixes for a pre-defined support period), I should maybe expect to have to pay for that continuing work.