4 ms·
That industry can lobby for and basically "purchase" scientific outcomes that affect health standards should be a defcon 1 red alert. People should be lose thei
by game_the0ry 9mo ago
That industry can lobby for and basically "purchase" scientific outcomes that affect health standards should be a defcon 1 red alert. People should be lose their careers over this, at the very least imo.
And the fact that people do not care is just as, if not more, concerning.
This is how you get MAHA, which I support bc of this, craziness included.
- Alex2037 9mo ago>That industry can lobby for and basically "purchase" scientific outcomes that affect health standards should be a defcon 1 red alert. why? the state does not need you to live past your retirement age. in fact, it's preferable if you don't.
- kenferry 9mo agoEr, how does putting your faith in literally vibes (MAHA) follow. Just complete rejection of expertise and science.
- morshu9001 9mo agoYeah, I completely reject nutritional science. Even without bribes involved, there are just too many complexities for them to draw useful conclusions. Ignored the food pyramid too.
- boston_clone 9mo agoYou should try the carnivore diet and completely eliminate Vitamin C intake to prove them scientists wrong! Scurvy is just a complex myth, after all. Just like rickets, or blindness from Vitamin A deficiency.
- game_the0ry 9mo agoBc that "expertise" was bought and paid for which is why we have a food pyramid that does more harm good.
- boston_clone 9mo agowe have a food pyramid again? since when?
- kenferry 9mo agoThe part I do not understand is why you then DO buy MAHA. Why is completely making things up better? If you think nutritional science is too unreliable, I can see that perspective. The conclusion then should be “I don’t know” not “trust the people who argue with psychological techniques instead of science”.