4 ms·
I think I would prefer the former if I were reviewing a CV. It at least tells me they understood the code well enough to know where to make their minor tweaks.
by jasonfarnon 9mo ago
I think I would prefer the former if I were reviewing a CV. It at least tells me they understood the code well enough to know where to make their minor tweaks. (I've spent hours reading through a repo to know where to insert/comment out a line to suit my needs.) The second tells me nothing.
- dugidugout 9mo agoIts odd you don't apply the same analysis to each. The latter certainly can provide a similar trail indicating knowledge of the use case and necessary parameters to achieve it. And certainly the former doesnt preclude llm interlocking.
- lomase 9mo agoWhy do you write like that?
- dugidugout 9mo agoIt would help if I had a better understanding of what you mean by "that". I generally write to liberate my consciousness from isolation. When doing so in a public forum I am generally doing so in response to an assertion. When responding to an assertion I am generally attempting to understand the framing which produced the assertion. I suppose you may also be speaking to the voice which is emergent. I am not very well read, so you may find my style unconventional or sloppy. I generally try not to labor too much in this regard and hope this will develop as I continue to write. I am receptive to any feedback you have for me.
- xpe 9mo agoI'm sorry that other person spoke to you that way. The vast majority of us aren't like that. I appreciate your comments!
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]