> That sounds like a one in a billion kind of coincident Hardware is more likely to fail under load than at idle. Blaming the last thing that was happening be

> That sounds like a one in a billion kind of coincident Hardware is more likely to fail under load than at idle. Blaming the last thing that was happening before hardware failed isn't a good conclusion, especially when the failure mode manifests as random startup failures instead of a predictable stop at some software stage.