4 ms·

While you care it's not the edge of space, and I care, do your mother care? Does she know the difference between the two, or is 128,000 feet just really high, a

by caw 14y ago

While you care it's not the edge of space, and I care, do your mother care? Does she know the difference between the two, or is 128,000 feet just really high, and might as well be outer space. If anyone does figure it out, well yeah it's a marketing spin, but it doesn't discount what he did and what it took to get there.

anonymouz 14y ago
But with such a huge spin on it, people will not only miss an opportunity to be educated on what he actually did, they are actively being misled about it. I just can't stand such rubbish tactics. The jump height is just one particular point that I noticed, and it was a point where they seemed to deliberately put a lot of spin on it in a couple of places: 1) They consistently called it "edge of space". It's a lot closer to an airliners flight height than the edge of space (100km). 2) Their consistent use of fish-eye lenses for the outside imagery made it seem like you can actually see the earth's curvature, conjuring up images of space-flight. 3) Whenever he talked with Kittinger on the ground, they background animation showed a rotating earth from LEO. Together this all seems to mislead an unsuspecting viewer into believing that he jumped from somewhere a lot higher. What's wrong with being honest about it being 39km and nowhere near space?
- Evbn 14y ago
  39 is more than halfway from 13 to 100, on a reasonable logarithmic scale.
  - anonymouz 14y ago
    On a logarithmic scale I can easily get halfway to the top of Mount Everest by walking onto some hill. Doesn't mean I should claim I went there. It seems the highest a balloon ever went was 53km. SpaceShipOne went to the 100km and it took them a lot more effort. The altitude record for jet aircraft is 37,650m, this is about the same as the height he jumped from and seems be a better comparison to me. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_altitude_record http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_altitude_record

by caw 14y ago

anonymouz 14y ago

But with such a huge spin on it, people will not only miss an opportunity to be educated on what he actually did, they are actively being misled about it. I just can't stand such rubbish tactics. The jump height is just one particular point that I noticed, and it was a point where they seemed to deliberately put a lot of spin on it in a couple of places: 1) They consistently called it "edge of space". It's a lot closer to an airliners flight height than the edge of space (100km). 2) Their consistent use of fish-eye lenses for the outside imagery made it seem like you can actually see the earth's curvature, conjuring up images of space-flight. 3) Whenever he talked with Kittinger on the ground, they background animation showed a rotating earth from LEO. Together this all seems to mislead an unsuspecting viewer into believing that he jumped from somewhere a lot higher. What's wrong with being honest about it being 39km and nowhere near space?

Evbn 14y ago
39 is more than halfway from 13 to 100, on a reasonable logarithmic scale.
- anonymouz 14y ago
  On a logarithmic scale I can easily get halfway to the top of Mount Everest by walking onto some hill. Doesn't mean I should claim I went there. It seems the highest a balloon ever went was 53km. SpaceShipOne went to the 100km and it took them a lot more effort. The altitude record for jet aircraft is 37,650m, this is about the same as the height he jumped from and seems be a better comparison to me. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_altitude_record http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_altitude_record