3 ms·
I think we’ll eventually have some technology to make this realistic. Supersonic flights powered by jet/rocket engines might not be it for all we know. IMO we
by fooker 10mo ago
I think we’ll eventually have some technology to make this realistic.
Supersonic flights powered by jet/rocket engines might not be it for all we know. IMO we are still pretty early in the history of aviation as a technology.
- dotancohen 10mo agoIf you are already mentioning rocket propulsion, then you should know that Gwen Shotwell foresees Starship flying E2E (point to point on Earth) flights with paying passengers, competing with airlines. One hour to anywhere on the planet.
- fooker 10mo agoHopefully we discover some sort of gravity physics/tech that makes chemical rockets obsolete! I don't see Starship being useful for civilian transport use cases, but for military operations sure! But there's not much to distinguish a starship from a nuke launch during a war, so it remains to be seen whether that risk is worth it.
- robotresearcher 10mo ago> One hour to anywhere on the planet. Anywhere they can take off from, which is a decent distance from a population center. The last (forty?) mile problem bites again.
- inglor_cz 10mo agoI can imagine Starship landing on a sea launchpad (in coastal cities), and the last 30 miles can be taken by a speedboat in half an hour. The sea usually isn't as traffic-jammed as land communications, and boats, unlike high-speed trains, don't require that much infrastructure.
- mrguyorama 10mo agoWhich is nonsense. Not only will rockets never have airplane reliability and safety for basic physics reasons, but that rocket profile looks exactly like an ICBM and nobody wants to let that confusion happen.
- dotancohen 10mo agoAirplane flight trajectories look exactly like a V1 missile, and even modern tomahawks could be made to fly such a profile. Or it could be a subsonic B-1B instead of a Boeing 747. Solutions to IFF have decades of development.