4 ms·
Some of the world is running on emails and excel sheets. That’s doable for an agent already, if you’re willing to let it loose. Problem is, how do you get all y
by manmal 10mo ago
Some of the world is running on emails and excel sheets. That’s doable for an agent already, if you’re willing to let it loose. Problem is, how do you get all your values and unknown knowns into its context?
- irishcoffee 10mo agoI can say with absolute certainty that I have never used an LLM to tweak an email, and will never, ever use an LLM “agent” on my email, work or personal. “Hey, how’s that hardware/software integration effort coming? What are your thoughts on the hardware so far?” Fuck me if I let an LLM answer that.
- austinbaggio 10mo agoWilling to let them loose is the more salient point. If you let your agents loose on your entire body of output and tools at work, then you'll build that knowledge up pretty quickly. Tall ask right now, with privacy and agency (no pun intended) concerns
- manmal 10mo agoI’d bet that an agent would never be able to act the same on an email as I would. It just lacks my world view. This begs the question, would it really make sense for it to write emails on my behalf? It will certainly “close the loop” one way or the other, but I doubt I would like the outcome. On the clawdbot discord, someone wrote today that, overnight, Claude sent in all iMessage threads from 2019 the message that it will rather ignore such outdated threads.