3 ms·
> This seems incredibly inefficient. Very inefficient but good for safety: if an engine is failing, you hopefully might discover that while taxiing rather than
by tetromino_ 10mo ago
> This seems incredibly inefficient.
Very inefficient but good for safety: if an engine is failing, you hopefully might discover that while taxiing rather than when you are in the death zone 25 meters up in the air.
- Reason077 10mo agoNot an expert, but intuition suggests this probably isn’t true. If an engine is going to fail spontaneously it’s almost certainly going to happen at high thrust, not while at idle or very low thrust values during taxi.
- philipwhiuk 10mo agoYour intuition is wrong. Engines experience issues when changing speeds (especially start-up) not when at steady thrust output.
- Reason077 9mo agoFair enough. But delaying engine start-up until the aircraft has nearly finished taxiing wouldn’t have any effect on the way the engine operates during start-up. It just means it would spend less time at idle or near-idle speeds during taxi.