4 ms·
(Not the user you were replying to) If Rust is no less safe than C in such a regard, then what benefit is Rust providing that C could not? I am genuinely curio
by hirvi74 10mo ago
(Not the user you were replying to)
If Rust is no less safe than C in such a regard, then what benefit is Rust providing that C could not? I am genuinely curious because OS development is not my forte. I assume the justification to implement Rust must be contingent on more than Rust just being 'newer = better', right?
- gf000 10mo agoIt's not less safe in C interop. It is significantly safer at everything else.