4 ms·
That's a bit of an arbitrary constraint, given that Nazism is widely understood to be a particular brand of fascism. Wikipedia does a descent job, if you're re
by dxdm 9mo ago
That's a bit of an arbitrary constraint, given that Nazism is widely understood to be a particular brand of fascism.
Wikipedia does a descent job, if you're really wondering how it might be done using different words. Given your odd challenge, I suspect you might not really care, though.
In case I'm wrong, here are, for your convenience, but also for others who might stumble across this nasty thread:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism
- eudamoniac 9mo agoI asked because his other replies in this topic imply to me that his definition of Nazi is much more broad than the literal definition, and would result in a lot more executions than just of the people who adhere to a Nazi ideology as strictly defined by Wikipedia.
- dxdm 9mo agoThat's a good point. Goes to show how quickly things get arbitrary once you start chopping off heads in the name of ideas. It's disturbing how quickly people get their axes ready, even just from their behind their keyboards. I'm used to it from other places, but it's sad to see this here. I wish there'd be some sort of dream-like simulation for people to experience the consequences of their ideas: "Congratulations, your policy killed millions of people and fed them to the pigs. Due to the sloppy definition, and a blind spot on your behalf, this includes yourself. Then there was a war and your family is now dead. Would you like to try again?" Sorry for not-so-politely wondering what was behind your question. It's a fraught topic.