4 ms·
Baseball is largely zero sum. Reading isn't. Finding good books regardless of reputation is the way to go. But knowing what is good is hard, so you should trust
by ivankirigin 14y ago
Baseball is largely zero sum. Reading isn't. Finding good books regardless of reputation is the way to go. But knowing what is good is hard, so you should trust persona recommendations first and ten reputation.
- andrewcooke 14y agowhy is baseball zero sum? it's like rounders isn't it? so how does one side getting round (or whatever it's called in baseball) mean that the other team cannot? does the sum of the scores of the two sides always sum to the same value? i imagine not. so what an odd thing to assert. why?
- Retric 14y agoFor a team the score for a single game in meaningless it's simply win/loss. Think of it like this. If simply increasing the score was of value teams could simply walk the first 3 batters each inning. I mean it's within the rules and just think how much more exciting the game would be if each inning started with bases loaded.
- andrewcooke 14y agooh, ok, sure (sorry).
- lmm 14y agoIn a baseball league the only way for one team to do better is for other teams to do worse. This means that as a baseball manager trying to buy players (in what's pretty much an auction), knowing who the best players are is actually quite unimportant, because top players generally command top prices. What you look for are the players who are undervalued by the other teams, so that you can get them cheaper than they're worth. This really isn't the case for books, because they're generally sold at a fixed price and if there's high demand they'll just print more of them. So it's a lot more reasonable to just look for the best books and read them.