4 ms·
I concur. Just using AI to write boilerplate with a simple "Do what I did for this for these" request and it's like what I hoped The Future would be, 5 years a
by damnitbuilds 10mo ago
I concur.
Just using AI to write boilerplate with a simple "Do what I did for this for these" request and it's like what I hoped The Future would be, 5 years ago. It's great !
But get over-ambitious with your requests and you get over-complex almost-solutions that, indeed, take up all your time to fix and I find this takes all the fun out of development - you have to restart coding something from scratch that you had "almost" finished a day ago.
But when you get to know the AI's limits, it is definitely a time-saver.
Hmm, I think I will trademark "Over-complex almost-solutions".
- chrisjj 10mo ago> But get over-ambitious with your requests Have you first asked the bot if the request is overambitious? :) > But when you get to know the AI's limits That would be when you know whether its output can be trusted, right? And there's the problem. Software is way beyond the point where product can be adequately proved. We rely on process control. And stochastic parroting does not cut it.
- damnitbuilds 10mo agoI suspect the AI-Dunning-Kruger effect would come into play.