4 ms·
Kube - CSS framework
- chovy 14y agohey, this may be exactly what i was looking for. thanks
- lobo_tuerto 14y agoIt could be this: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ Or maybe this one, too: http://foundation.zurb.com/ http://foundation.zurb.com/
- eungyu 14y agowhy not bootstrap?
- lukifer 14y agoI love the aesthetic and the semantics. Nice job! However, I'm not seeing any responsiveness to the grid; it renders the same when I resize the browser or view in mobile.
- vmind 14y agoThe example at http://imperavi.com/kube/demo/ http://imperavi.com/kube/demo/ is responsive, I'm not sure why their documentation isn't too.
- hobonumber1 14y agoNice work - it's always good to see new CSS frameworks coming out
- tangue 14y agoIt's pleasant to the eyes but : - "Free" is not the kind of license I trust (there's a guy talking about his stealed code on HN this sunday, just check) - Not responsive ? Come on we're in 2012 - It would be better if it was hosted on github (or bitbucket). So everyone could improve it (but again what's the license ?) There's a lot of competition in this field and at this stage I don't see any valid reason to use this one, rather than say Bootstrap, Foundation or Skeleton.
- parmgrewal 14y agoYes, you are absolutely right about license. Even i was reading that article (Tax_Cloud one right?).
- ericcholis 14y agoOne of the examples shows the responsive features: http://imperavi.com/kube/demo/ http://imperavi.com/kube/demo/
- tangue 14y ago...And it works pretty well. I apologize
- arunoda 14y agoI think they don't mean to give it away free in the long run. They did it for redactor[1] too. (I think it is the full featured awesome and simple WYSIWYG editor) It's totally upto the developer to decide upon on the licence. There are lot of projects under FREE, but not open sourced. [1] - http://imperavi.com/redactor/ http://imperavi.com/redactor/
- paulgb 14y agoI emailed the authors about a week ago and Alex clarified that free to them means it can be redistributed freely. I agree that an actual license would be reassuring though.
- dstarh1976 14y agoIt seems like bootstrap with less features
- paulgb 14y agoSometimes, that's exactly what you need.
- wheaties 14y agoNice but Zurb does this and so much more.
- arunoda 14y agoAs others said, why not bootstrap?
- highace 14y agoBecause bootstrap is totally overused, some differentiation would be nice.
- arunoda 14y agoAgree.
- huragok 14y agoI'd argue that Bootstrap the framework isn't overused, however default bootstrap theming is.
- jh3 14y agoThere's no argument. You are just correct. Saying Bootstrap is overused is like saying Wordpress is overused which does not matter. The fact is, as you said, the default look and feel of websites using these frameworks is overused, not the technology behind the websites. The backend should be overused.
- redshoediaries 14y agoExactly. Something as simple as using different typography or changing button style defaults would go a long way. I understand the idea of using something more minimal for just grid etc, but for me, it hasn't been enough of an issue to not use bootstrap.
- mkumm 14y agoI don't see this solving a problem that doesn't already have a (few) solutions. It is early and I will add this to my radar
- eberfreitas 14y agoI would love if there was a project like "bootstriped", where I would get all the classes but with minimal styling, with just a visual hint of what they should look like. I could very easily adapt them to my own needs and designs. Does that sounds like a good idea? I might actually do it (or not).
- joycer 14y agoThis is great. These frameworks usually have a .css and a .min.css file. I would love to see one that has a .verbose.css where all possible attributes or properties are listed and commented out in the brackets for that element. As a reference or resource to grab a chunk from for your own .css file.