4 ms·
>For me personally, I only want to see politics that are directly tech-adjacent here. Since when is government censorship of social media posts[1] not "direct
by alterom 9mo ago
>For me personally, I only want to see politics that are directly tech-adjacent here.
Since when is government censorship of social media posts[1] not "directly tech-adjacent"?
I adore the mental gymnastics here.
[1] The post with Mark Kelly being discussed: https://www.instagram.com/reels/DRMxZAnlUF9/ https://www.instagram.com/reels/DRMxZAnlUF9/
- iamnothere 9mo agoThe article did not make it clear that this was related to social media at all. It just said he “released a video” over and over again. I guess it is related, but it’s a terrible article for not including that fact or linking to the original post. Thanks for adding context. No thanks for the “mental gymnastics” snark.
- itsdrewmiller 9mo agoThe fact that it was a social media post is not an interesting part of the story - he could have just as easily said the same thing on TV to the same result. They aren't trying to censor social media as a result.