4 ms·

Sure, but my point is that the semantics between C++ and Rust are different, and are therefore not an exact match as the article stated.

• mgaunard 9mo ago
  In C++, you define the semantics yourself.
  • wtetzner 9mo ago
    No, const semantics are defined by the language definition.
    • mgaunard 9mo ago
      It's defined by whatever you put in your const overloads. const is primarily a type annotation that affects overload resolution. You must be confused because Rust has no overloading to begin with.