4 ms·
Correct. No license implies copyright.
by drewtemp 14y ago
Correct. No license implies copyright.
- calvin 14y agoI'd explicitly state the license to be blunt, obvious, and avoid any confusion.
- drewtemp 14y agoAgreed and lesson learned.
- orjan 14y agoCopyright exists regardless of license. So to say "implies copyright" isn't exactly true.
- chris_wot 14y agoIn terms of material implication, the only way that proposition can be false is if there was a copyright license but there was no copyright.
- 178 14y agoThe author (or his company) always has the copyrights (if it is not sold) and thus can license it any way(s) wanted, for example und open source licenses. Authors in certain countries can also release their code into the public domain -- that would be the only situation where there is no copyright involved anymore.