3 ms·
That's Communism and we can't have that. Hell, can't even agree that people would pay for the universal health insurance (via tax), and you now propose that gov
by Yizahi 10mo ago
That's Communism and we can't have that. Hell, can't even agree that people would pay for the universal health insurance (via tax), and you now propose that government subsidize electricity? Funny joke :) .
By the way, energy generation is only 1/4 to 1/3 of all emissions on average, so transitioning the fraction of that fraction to a lesser amount of emissions (since there a ton of emissions in manufacturing, transporting and installing solar panels) is nice and cool, but not very efficient to combat climate change.
- melling 10mo ago“There’s a more perfect way to fix the problem…” Yes, there always is. 40 years later… Global commercial aviation is about 3% of all emissions”. Reducing that 25-30% to 15-20% is significant.
- kachapopopow 10mo agoit's not about climate change, it's about providing a better service at lower cost and better longevity: no aging above ground or underground wires, no massive distribution centers, decentralized grid at time of war (ukraine is switching to solar), benefits are astonishing the further you dive into it. several apartment buildings can also be linked together to handle maintenance and share peak power capability as well.