3 ms·
> But as far as I understand, if the platform provides tools to create a certain type of harmful content, section 230 doesn’t protect it. That's interesting -
by biophysboy 9mo ago
> But as far as I understand, if the platform provides tools to create a certain type of harmful content, section 230 doesn’t protect it.
That's interesting - do you have a link for this? I'd be curious to know more of the section's details.
- darth_avocado 9mo agoAgain I’m not a lawyer and this is my interpretation of the #3 requirement of section 230: “The information must be "provided by another information content provider", i.e., the defendant must not be the "information content provider" of the harmful information at issue” If grok is generating these images, I am interpreting this as Twitter could be becoming an information content provider. I couldn’t find any relevant rulings but I doubt any exist since services like Grok are relatively new.