This is still a bad faith argument. No one wants suicides increasing as a result of AI chatbot usage. So what is the point of your question? You are trying to

This is still a bad faith argument. No one wants suicides increasing as a result of AI chatbot usage. So what is the point of your question? You are trying to drain nuance from the conversation to turn it into a black and white statement. If “aim for zero” means we should restrict access to chatbots with zero statical evidence, no. We should not engage in moral panic. We should figure out what dangers these pose and then decide what appropriate actions, if any, should be taken. We should not give in to knee jerk reactions because we read a news story.