> At this point in time, no comment that has the string "230" in it is saying that Section 230 absolves X of anything. You are correct; I read your earlier pos

> At this point in time, no comment that has the string "230" in it is saying that Section 230 absolves X of anything. You are correct; I read your earlier post as "did we forget our already established principle"? I admit I'm a bit tilted by X doing this. In my defense, there are people making the "blame the user, not the tool" argument here though, which is the core idea of section 230