> Governments don't ban any of those things. And the poster upthread used "regulate" for that reason, I presume. > I wish I could argue the "regulate" point b

> Governments don't ban any of those things. And the poster upthread used "regulate" for that reason, I presume. > I wish I could argue the "regulate" point but you failed to provide even a single example AI regulation you want to see enforced. It's OK to want something to be regulated without a proposal. I want dangerous chemicals regulated, but I'm happy to let chemical experts weigh in on how rather than guessing myself. I want fecal bacterial standards for water, but I couldn't possibly tell you the right level to pick. If you really need a specific proposal example, I'd like to see a moratorium on AI-powered therapy for now; I think it's a form of human medical experimentation that'd be subject to licensing, IRB approval, and serious compliance requirements in any other form.