3 ms·
> No idea what "vibes" are. If your English is weak, there are dictionaries, translation programs, and LLMs that can help. The first meaning at https://www.mer
by antonvs 10mo ago
> No idea what "vibes" are.
If your English is weak, there are dictionaries, translation programs, and LLMs that can help. The first meaning at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vibe https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vibe is “a distinctive feeling or quality capable of being sensed,” which is the relevant one here.
The OP article refers to “outputs that sexualized real people without consent.” If any of those real people are minors, that qualifies as CSAM. It’s not complicated.
- dmitrygr 10mo agoGiven that “put X into a bikini” is constitutionally protected speech, and the output fails the Roth test for obscenity and is thus the same, would not every other law be null and void w.r.t. stoping this? And “qualifies as X according to some unelected org with no lawmaking power” is even weaker than a law. You dislike it. I get it. I do too. But this is a discussion of law. Legally, I do not see how any law was broken. I welcome any citation to the contrary. I note, again, that "some unelected org said so" is not a weighty argument when the opposition is the SCOTUS's clear stance on the 1st amendment.