3 ms·
> IIRC this was actually the spec, and IE decided to ignore it and do something saner That's actually a little unfair on IE. This behaviour predates there even
by nicoburns 10mo ago
> IIRC this was actually the spec, and IE decided to ignore it and do something saner
That's actually a little unfair on IE. This behaviour predates there even being a spec. IE and Netscape did it differently, and as a general rule Netscape's behaviour tended to be what ended up in the spec. This was mostly a good thing, but not so much in this case.