3 ms·
I guess I should say more accurately: Their mission is to both archive it and publish it. They seem to be explicitly against copyright, on principle. Which I
by MarsIronPI 9mo ago
I guess I should say more accurately: Their mission is to both archive it and publish it. They seem to be explicitly against copyright, on principle. Which I greatly respect.
- drnick1 9mo agoIt's time to abolish copyright. It creates more problems (stiffles innovation, creates rents) than it solves (rewards innovation).
- mmooss 9mo agoIt doesn't create problems for large companies that make AI systems.
- tertle950 9mo agoYeah, it seems to only be a problem when you're a human being remixing the culture you grew up with. Meta can admit to soullessly scraping books they don't own for their for-profit AI datasets [1], and it's not a problem because they're Meta. But if you're an artist? Nope. Sampling in hip hop songs, for example, is in a "complex legal gray area" (translation: "it's illegal but we don't want to admit that out loud") [2]. [1] https://futurism.com/the-byte/facebook-trained-ai-pirated-books https://futurism.com/the-byte/facebook-trained-ai-pirated-bo... [2] https://urbanspook.com/copyright-laws-2025-impact-on-hip-hop-sampling/ https://urbanspook.com/copyright-laws-2025-impact-on-hip-hop...