2 ms·
Beyond that, any lag from Win95 era was probably because of spinning hard drives. Running it on a SSD would be instantaneous. Also, file search might even work,
by 0cf8612b2e1e 10mo ago
Beyond that, any lag from Win95 era was probably because of spinning hard drives. Running it on a SSD would be instantaneous. Also, file search might even work, instead of whatever we have now.
- xnx 10mo agoI don't know how I used Windows before I installed Everything.
- komodo99 10mo agoI can attest to this one, 6 months ago I had a vintage pc I needed to rehab due to the curse of the proprietary ISA card. Imaged the failing drive to an ssd, sata->IDE adapter. P3 733MHz, 128 mb ram, W98SE, its astonishingly fast and responsive. Boots nearer to my memories of MSDOS 6.22 firing up than anything else. Acrobat reader still performs like a lead balloon though, even a miracle can't fix that one.
- CapsAdmin 10mo agoThe responsiveness of windows 2000 in a vm is insane. It feels like every action happens instantaneously. Contrast this with the "os" of my LG oled monitor. It seriously takes 5 seconds to open the settings menu.
- userbinator 10mo agoContrast this with the "os" of my LG oled monitor. It seriously takes 5 seconds to open the settings menu. I'm not sure what they use these days, but 10-15 years ago the MCU in a monitor was likely to be a ~10MHz 8051.
- userbinator 10mo agoA whole installation of Win95 with Office95 is only a few hundred MB and would fit entirely in RAM on a modern system. You can run a VM of it like that to experience the extreme speed. Even a browser these days uses several times that.