2 ms·
What? That's the laziest argument against IPFS. Bind it on one interface or just use a VM.
by flipped 9mo ago
What? That's the laziest argument against IPFS. Bind it on one interface or just use a VM.
- mystraline 9mo agoDefaults absolutely matter. And no, I dont my whole internal network enumerable because of 'convenience'.
- flipped 9mo agoI don't think the kind of crowd IPFS attracts would wanna use the default config. Most ould choose to configure according to their setup.
- anthk 9mo agoYou are right; it's a bit of a excuse. Tons of small services under Unix (by default) listen on several interfaces and networks. I think Bitlbee itself listened on 0.0.0.0 instead of localhost. Ditto with some UPNP/DLNA daemons. It takes very little to set up IPFS to just listen to tun0, disable routing (let ygg do its job) and throttle the bw a little so it doesn't hog the whole network. I would be surprised if the Kubo/IPFS developers didn't already configure Ygg for themselves, as both are software written in Go. The author of NNCP https://nncp.mirrors.quux.org/ https://nncp.mirrors.quux.org/ (and the other author from Tofuproxy) are pretty much aware of Yggdrasil.