3 ms·
Says the man who charges to have his photograph taken by fans What does that have to do with any of the things he mentioned in the post?
by fletchowns 14y ago
Says the man who charges to have his photograph taken by fans
What does that have to do with any of the things he mentioned in the post?
- apawloski 14y agoNothing. It's a typical ad hominem attack and the parent comment either 1) doesn't understand that this does nothing to invalidate an argument or 2) doesn't care.
- raverbashing 14y agohttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrisy http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrisy Basically, it's ok for him to charge for his right of image, it's ok for the GPL to place limits on IP, but it's not ok for others to charge for other rights like IP or limit the ways their IP can be used (Right of image is not IP, it's a Personality right, still - and I agree with the GPL)
- rhizome 14y agoSo you'd criticize him for speaking against any limits?