2 ms·
Open source, when talking about linux and related apps has mostly been a force for good. Improving competition, innovation, extending support for products, hel
by tonymet 10mo ago
Open source, when talking about linux and related apps has mostly been a force for good. Improving competition, innovation, extending support for products, helping train & inspire young developers in the trade. Gates claimed it would destroy the software industry, and years later the industry grew much faster off open source than it would have otherwise, and made Microsoft more competitive than they would have otherwise.
That being said, there are negative aspects. Open source advocates can be a bit sanctimonious in the other direction. For example, complaints (not from the devs themselves) about corporations making loads off ffmpeg, or openssl, without adequately compensating them. Even though companies are employing the licensed apps as intended. Another issue is how entitled open source consumers can be: demanding free access to apps, or judging seemingly trivial apps for charging a fee.
Selling even a trivial business is hard work, and 90% of the time there's much more nuance to a business than meets the eye.
If someone chooses to donate their time for free, and it's not done out of spite to undermine a competitor, it's probably a good thing. But we could all use a bit more humility and introspection.
- maxkfranz 10mo agoThese are all great points. A big value of OSS is that it can obviate the need to reinvent the wheel. We should cheer on when open source software is used, regardless of whether the users are corporations or individuals.
- tonymet 10mo agoI generally agree, though I encourage more open source devs to consider commercial licensing. Commercial licenses are not incompatible with open source. For example, you can GPL code, and if a company does want to use it privately, sell them a license for their own private use. I never understood why the open source ecosystem consolidated onto GPL-ish and MIT.