3 ms·
FWIW, the actual apology is well written.
by 0______0 9mo ago
FWIW, the actual apology is well written.
- decimalenough 9mo agoAlthough little note at the very end explains why: > This note is in response to emails from Eli Grey to Chrome leadership from October, 2023 In other words, he wrote this because he was forced to.
- tuananh 9mo agothat's going a bit far, no?
- wallawe 9mo ago[flagged]
- Sephr 9mo agoThat is not what I posted. My original post, accessible via the GitHub comment version history is "@addyosmani No problem; just remember that modifying someone else's code does not grant you any copyright to that code. I don't agree with your opinion that inserting existing code into a template (the API) for a framework (Modernizr) warrants a notice of credit, even with a few changes to the code being inserted."
- wallawe 9mo agoi misread it - apologies - happy to delete. there's not currently a button for it so i will reach out to the hn team.
- ohso4 9mo agoIf you run it through originality.ai, you'll see that bits of it are his writing, some is mixed and some is just ai. This blog post everyone is discussing is also written with ai.
- nubg 9mo agoAnd who or what is "originality.ai" supposed to be that makes it an authority on AI provenance (an unsolvable problem)?
- fragmede 9mo agolol you believe that site for more than a second?
- m0zzie 9mo agoThat site happily flags writing older than the modern AI era. It's a worthless grift, which has unfortunately suckered many.
- Sephr 9mo agoAddy told me that he didn't use AI to write his apology. I can see why people might suspect otherwise though.