3 ms·
What do you think of Dr. Schooling's response that the Mendellian effects might be inflated? I think they had a good defense but was not entirely convinced they
by graboy 9mo ago
What do you think of Dr. Schooling's response that the Mendellian effects might be inflated? I think they had a good defense but was not entirely convinced they hadn't sidestepped the issue that Schooling was getting at, wasn't sure either way.
https://www.jacc.org/doi/epdf/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.067 https://www.jacc.org/doi/epdf/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.067
- KempyKolibri 9mo agoI wasn’t aware of that critique, thanks for sharing. Before I read the response my first thought was “why such consistency across different SNPs, then?”, so I would certainly agree with that aspect of the defence. In general, Ference’s explanation just seems more parsimonious than Schooling’s. It’s possible that they’re right, but I think they would need to show that the specific genes in Ference’s study are affected by age in this way. I wouldn’t claim to be a great expert in MR, though. I can just about keep up with surface level understanding of them but once you get into the nitty gritty stats, pleitropy testing etc it’s a bit over my head tbh.