4 ms·
> Now any remote learning will need physical examination I don't think so. Proving you can pass a test is pretty useless imo. Especially when it typically boi
by thunky 9mo ago
> Now any remote learning will need physical examination
I don't think so. Proving you can pass a test is pretty useless imo. Especially when it typically boils down to a memorization test and the subject matter is largely irrelevant.
- intended 9mo agoProving you can pass an open book test ? Or doing graded assignments? That wasn’t something possible prior to LLMs. Being able to cheat code or generate homework assignments was not this trivial either.
- thunky 9mo agoI think people need to figure out how to demonstrate they can add value on top of AI rather than showing they can do it all from scratch with a "closed book".
- intended 9mo agoThis is at a level of abstraction that allows one to say something hopeful, and let the details blow up in one’s face for later. A better example would be “we don’t use fork lifts to do our gym exercises” The whole issue with AI is the verification labour. This requires people to have the skill / discernment to make out if the output is useless or not. Building this human capability is fundamentally a product of learning, training and experience. All of which require exams, tests and verification.