3 ms·
> The Linux base system There is no such thing as a Linux base system. Separate components, separate people. Hence the term Ganoo plus Leenox...
by schmuckonwheels 9mo ago
> The Linux base system
There is no such thing as a Linux base system.
Separate components, separate people.
Hence the term Ganoo plus Leenox...
- yjftsjthsd-h 9mo agoWell, no, my exact argument is that there is a base system, even if it is composed of assorted components. If you install Debian (or whatever) on a machine, the software installed by the package manager ships as a unified release that has been adapted to work together. I think it's reasonable to call that the base OS. And then, separate from that base system that is managed by the package manager, the local admin my install things into /usr/local.
- schmuckonwheels 9mo agoIf you can remove GNU coreutils and replace them with something else (like that Rust garbage) then you don't have a base system. You have a loose collection of packages around a kernel.
- Krutonium 9mo agoReplaces the GNU Coreutils with the Rusty ones on BSD
- LoganDark 9mo agoThey're talking about Linux, the kernel. The kernel has no concept of a base system. There is initramfs and init.
- yjftsjthsd-h 9mo agoOkay, that's true but other than the slight semantic point of "Linux" vs a "Linux distro" or "GNU/Linux" I don't think it matters. Whatever words you use to describe it, there is a base OS which is composed of a variety of components from different sources but which ultimately amounts to a single thing.
- LoganDark 9mo ago> there is a base OS In most distributions yes, there is Linux and then there is userspace on top of it. What you call "base system" is actually part of userspace, which has nothing to do with Linux itself.
- yjftsjthsd-h 9mo agoNo, what I call the "base system" is the result of running debootstrap, and encompasses all the packages that make a complete operating system. The kernel is just one part of the OS.