<< The harms range from minor (annoyance, or running down the wrong path because I didn’t have a good idea to start with) to dangerous (reinforcing paranoia and

<< The harms range from minor (annoyance, or running down the wrong path because I didn’t have a good idea to start with) to dangerous (reinforcing paranoia and psychotic thoughts). Do you agree that these are problems, and there a more useful term or categorization for these issues? I think that the issue is a little more nuanced. The problems you mentioned are problems of sort, but the 'solution' in place kneecaps one of the ways llms ( as offered by various companies ) were useful. You mention the problem is reinforcement of the bad tendencies, but no indication of reinforcement of good ones. In short, I posit that the harms should not outweigh the benefits of augmentation. Because this is the way it actually does appear to work: 1. dumb people get dumber 2. smart people get smarter 3. psychopaths get more psychopathy I think there is a way forward here that does not have to include neutering seemingly useful tech.