10 ms·

Audio dongles and the ghost of USB 1

• Neywiny 10mo ago
  This article is formatted weirdly. At one point the author just says "bar chart of..." And there's no chart. There were a lot of what felt like missing graphics but they had descriptions. Edit: thanks to a reply, seems the images just aren't loading
  • AndrewDucker 10mo ago
    You're seeing the alt text, because the images are hosted on Google, and opening one (such as https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXdr83VwXrJQyhgpcXDdlcW1gh_A5k0iC6G93cTYQK9_lvJF550ZpaDl1STpIylGw5zUePWoLk0CUpQ77jmgHznBiEWwWLwrotj7ahMuW0B5SYWo6dfHptGV-TCfSPDtFCNAswzA=s16000?key=P7Ti68eY7X2T8FxzyLZ2og https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXdr83VwXrJQy... ) gives you an error.
• rasz 10mo ago
  >Why is this a problem now if it wasn’t in the 90s? I dont think his answer is correct. Real reason is there was no stupid bitrates and unrealistic bit depths craze back then. /insert mandatory Monty Montgomery from xiph explaining how A/D D/A and hearing works. >hardware that hit these sample rates and bit depths was mostly used by professionals professionals used Firewire audio interfaces, USB latency wasnt good enough