3 ms·
This is probably the smarter way actually. Alternatively there's apparently some nix flakes that have been developed. So, there's options. I just recommend p
by dijit 10mo ago
This is probably the smarter way actually.
Alternatively there's apparently some nix flakes that have been developed.
So, there's options.
I just recommend pinning your version and being intentional about upgrades.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- tasuki 10mo ago> This is probably the smarter way actually. Oh definitely. How can you suggest adding a binary to a git repository? It's a bad idea on many levels: it bloats the repository by several orders of magnitude, and it locks you to the chosen architecture and OS. Nope, nope, nope.
- 1718627440 10mo agoThe issue with binaries is when they are large, change often, is often a duplication of information already present, and that you can't diff them. A program is neither large, it doesn't change often, is not duplicate information and you don't want to diff them. IMHO this idea is fine, this is not added the build artifact in every commit type of situation.