3 ms·
That isn't manipulating the election. It has absolutely nothing to do with the election whatsoever. NDAs to cover up embarrassing personal matters have always
by terminalshort 10mo ago
That isn't manipulating the election. It has absolutely nothing to do with the election whatsoever. NDAs to cover up embarrassing personal matters have always been legal.
- lovich 10mo agoI don’t have anything to say further to you. I cannot help you reason your way out of an emotional position and if you think the stormy Daniel’s shit wasn’t done to hide the story during a campaign then you are in an emotional position.
- terminalshort 10mo agoOf course it was done for the campaign. But that isn't illegal, which is why he was not charged with any campaign finance related charges. You really can't seem to get that through your head, can you?
- lovich 10mo ago> It has absolutely nothing to do with the election whatsoever. > Of course it was done for the campaign. Did a 180 in two posts. Disrespectfully get fucked, I think you’re here in bad faith
- terminalshort 10mo agoYou do know that "it" can refer to two different things at different times, right? In this case the action, which had everything to do with the election, and the charges, which had nothing to do with it.